• Research
    • Research
    • Projects
      • Cross-cultural differences in the perception of corporate social responsibility and consumer social responsibility along global supply chains
      • Experimental studies of moral responsibility in global supply chains
      • Modelling economic and social dimensions of global supply chains
      • Global supply chains, environmental regulation and green innovation
      • Further KCG Projects
    • Publications
      • Working Papers
      • Journal Articles
      • Policy Papers
      • Public Contributions
    • News
  • People
    • Managing Director and Coordinator
    • Senior Fellows
    • Fellows
    • External Research Fellows
  • Events
  • About / Contact
KCG Kiel Menü

Menü

  • Research
  • People
  • Events
  • About

Do Climate Engineering Experts Display Moral-Hazard Behaviour?

12th November 2019
KCG Secretary
  • KCG Journal Articles
  • Publications

Authors: Christine Merk, Gert Pönitzsch and Katrin Rehdanz (Climate Policy, 2019, Vol. 19(2), 231-243)

Discourse analyses and expert interviews about climate engineering (CE) report high levels of reflectivity about the technologies’ risks and challenges, implying that CE experts are unlikely to display moral hazard behaviour, i.e. a reduced focus on mitigation. This has, however, not been empirically tested. Within CE experts we distinguish between experts for radiation management (RM) and for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and analyse whether RM and CDR experts display moral hazard behaviour. For RM experts, we furthermore look at whether they agree to laboratory and field research, and how they perceive the risks and benefits of one specific RM method, Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI). Analyzing experts’ preferences for climate-policy options, we do not find a reduction of the mitigation budget, i.e. moral hazard, for RM or CDR experts compared to climate-change experts who are neither experts for RM nor for CDR. In particular, the budget shares earmarked for RM are low. The perceptions of risks and benefits of SAI are similar for RM and climate-change experts. Despite the difference in knowledge and expertise, experts and laypersons share an understanding of the benefits, while their perceptions of the risks differ: experts perceive the risks to be larger.

 

Keywords: climate engineering, climate policy, climate change, stratospheric aerosol injection, negative emission technologies

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1494534


Involved Team members

  • Prof. Dr. Katrin Rehdanz

Projects

Project 1
Cross-cultural differences in the perception of corporate social responsibility and consumer social responsibility along global supply chains
Project 1
Experimental studies of moral responsibility in global supply chains
Project 1
Modelling economic and social dimensions of global supply chains
Project 1
Global supply chains, environmental regulation and green innovation

Other Projects

Cross-cultural differences in the perception of corporate social responsibility and consumer social responsibility along global supply chains Experimental studies of moral responsibility in global supply chains
Modelling economic and social dimensions of global supply chains Global supply chains, environmental regulation and green innovation Further KCG Projects

Partner

  • Research
  • Projects
  • PublicationsThe KCG has various series of publications to provide research findings and policy implications to different interested groups, e.g., students, academics, policy makers and the public. The lists of publications will be updated on a regular basis. Brief introductions to the latest publications are provided below.
  • News
  • People
  • Events
  • About / Contact
© 2023 - Kiel Centre for Globalization | Legal Notice | Privacy
Share on