• Research
    • Research
    • KCG Projects
    • Publications
      • Working Papers
      • Journal Articles
      • Policy Papers
      • Public Contributions
    • News
  • People
    • Managing Director and Coordinator
    • Fellows
    • External Research Fellows
  • Events
  • About / Contact
KCG Kiel Menü

Menü

  • Research
  • People
  • Events
  • About

(Mis)conceptions about Modelling Negative Emission Technologies

19th November 2021
KCG Secretary
  • KCG Journal Articles
  • Publications

Authors: Wilfried Rickels, Christine Merk, Fabian Reith, David P. Keller, Andreas Oschlies (Environmental Research Letters, 2019, 14(10), Article: 104004)

Intentionally removing carbon from the atmosphere with negative emission technologies (NETs) will be important to achieve net-zero emissions by mid-century and to limit global warming to 2 °C or even 1.5 °C (IPCC 2018). Model scenarios that consider NETs as part of mitigation pathways are still largely restricted to afforestation and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), while the ‘[f]easibility and sustainability of [NETs] use could be enhanced by a portfolio of options deployed at substantial, but lesser scales, rather than a single option at very large scale’ (IPCC 2018, p 19). Here, we show the results from an anonymous expert survey, including 32 Earth-System-Model (ESM) experts and 18 Integrated-Assessment-Model (IAM) experts, about the role of NETs in future climate policies and about how well the various technologies are represented in current models. We find that they strongly support the view that technology portfolios are required to achieve negative emissions, however, the responses show that the number and range of NETs that can be assessed in IAMs is small and that IAMs and ESMs are rather applied to analyze technologies separately than in combination. IAM experts in particular consider BECCS as part of a future NETs portfolio; but at the same time, all experts judge the constraints BECCS would face regarding future overall feasibility and more particularly regarding resource competition to be the highest. Regarding the assessment of constraints the ESM experts are much more skeptical than the IAM experts; they also think that the BECCS carbon removal pathways are less sufficiently represented in ESMs compared to what the IAM experts thinks about the representation in their models. Despite the perceived need for NETs portfolios, the range of NETs which can be assessed in IAMs is rather small and ocean NETs have, so far, mostly been overlooked by the IAM experts.

Keywords: negative emission technologies, Expert Survey, Integrated Assessment Modelling, Earth System Modeling

 

DOI: https:/doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab3ab4


Involved Team members

  • Prof. Dr. Wilfried Rickels

Projects

Project 1
Cross-cultural differences in the perception of corporate social responsibility and consumer social responsibility along global supply chains
Project 1
Experimental studies of moral responsibility in global supply chains
Project 1
Modelling economic and social dimensions of global supply chains
Project 1
Global supply chains, environmental regulation and green innovation

Other Projects

KCG Projects

Partner

  • Research
  • Projects
  • PublicationsThe KCG has various series of publications to provide research findings and policy implications to different interested groups, e.g., students, academics, policy makers and the public. The lists of publications will be updated on a regular basis. Brief introductions to the latest publications are provided below.
  • News
  • People
  • Events
  • About / Contact
© 2025 - Kiel Centre for Globalization | Legal Notice | Privacy
Share on
Unsere Website setzt Cookies, um das Angebot für Sie nutzerfreundlich und sicher zu gestalten, sowie zur Erhebung anonymisierter Statistiken. Ausführliche Informationen finden Sie in der Erklärung zum Datenschutz.AkzeptierenNeinErfahren Sie mehr