• Research
    • Research
    • Projects
      • Cross-cultural differences in the perception of corporate social responsibility and consumer social responsibility along global supply chains
      • Experimental studies of moral responsibility in global supply chains
      • Modelling economic and social dimensions of global supply chains
      • Global supply chains, environmental regulation and green innovation
      • Further KCG Projects
    • Publications
      • Working Papers
      • Journal Articles
      • Policy Papers
      • Public Contributions
    • News
  • People
    • Managing Director and Coordinator
    • Senior Fellows
    • Fellows
    • External Research Fellows
  • Events
  • About / Contact
KCG Kiel Menü

Menü

  • Research
  • People
  • Events
  • About

Environmental Regulation and Sustainable Competitiveness: Evaluating the Role of Firm-Level Green Investments in the Context of the Porter Hypothesis

30th January 2018
KCG Secretary
  • KCG Journal Articles
  • Publications

Authors: Jana Stoever and John P. Weche (Environmental and Resource Economics, 2018, Vol. 70(2), 429-455)

We investigate the impact of environmental regulation on firm performance and investment behavior. Exploiting the case of a German water withdrawal regulation that is managed on the state level, we analyze firms’ reactions to an increase in the water tax using a regression-adjusted difference-in-differences approach. We analyze the individual firm’s response to a change in environmental regulation, distinguishing between add-on and integrated environmental investments. This allows us to include innovation diffusion into our analysis, which is likely to be of importance for increasing resource-efficiency. Our results show that the regulation in question shows no sign of affecting firms’ overall competitiveness. The results imply that the predicted negative impact of the regulation on firms’ economic performance that was brought up before the introduction of the tax, does not seem to weigh heavily in this case. Nevertheless, when placed into a sustainable competitiveness context, the regulation considered does not qualify as an appropriate policy tool for fostering green growth.

 

Keywords: Environmental regulation, DID, Green growth, Green investment, Porter hypothesis, Sustainable competitiveness, Water withdrawal regulation 

JEL Classification: L60 , O31, O32, Q58, Q55

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0128-5


Involved Team members

Involved Team members

  • Dr. Jana Stöver

Projects

Project 1
Cross-cultural differences in the perception of corporate social responsibility and consumer social responsibility along global supply chains
Project 1
Experimental studies of moral responsibility in global supply chains
Project 1
Modelling economic and social dimensions of global supply chains
Project 1
Global supply chains, environmental regulation and green innovation

Other Projects

Cross-cultural differences in the perception of corporate social responsibility and consumer social responsibility along global supply chains Experimental studies of moral responsibility in global supply chains
Modelling economic and social dimensions of global supply chains Global supply chains, environmental regulation and green innovation Further KCG Projects

Partner

  • Research
  • Projects
  • PublicationsThe KCG has various series of publications to provide research findings and policy implications to different interested groups, e.g., students, academics, policy makers and the public. The lists of publications will be updated on a regular basis. Brief introductions to the latest publications are provided below.
  • News
  • People
  • Events
  • About / Contact
© 2023 - Kiel Centre for Globalization | Legal Notice | Privacy
Share on